Department of Education on Bankruptcy and Student Loans

Most Chicagoans have heard that you can’t wipe out student loan debt when you file for bankruptcy. This is not exactly true—it is difficult but not impossible to discharge student loans in certain circumstances. Commentators remain concerned about the massive student loan debt in our country. In response, the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) recently released guidance about “how it will handle bankruptcy discharge requests for government-backed student loan debt,” according to a recent article in the Huffington Post.
Department of Education Places Burden on Students
According to the article, the guidelines from the DOE are helpful but they tend to place the heaviest burden on student borrowers. The DOE “wants to provide a balance between collecting on student loans except where those loans would pose an undue hardship on the debtor,” and thus is seeking a “balance in collecting debts versus allowing debts to be discharged.” Student borrowers still will need to prove that their loans create an undue hardship under this formula.
Commenters suggest that the DOE’s guidance does “give some hope to those seeking discharge of some student loan debt,” since it maintains that student loans may be discharged in cases of an undue hardship.
Is the DOE’s definition of undue hardship easier to meet than the definition many debtors have unsuccessfully tried to meet in bankruptcy court? In other words, many student borrowers who have filed for consumer bankruptcy have sought to have their student loans—both private and federal—discharged through Chapter 7 bankruptcy. However, the undue hardship requirements for such a discharge often prove pretty tough to meet.
So what does the government’s description of undue hardship look like?
Federal Government’s Undue Hardship Factors
Keep in mind that, if you seek to have student loan debt discharged in bankruptcy, the court is likely to use either the Brunner test or a “Totality of the Circumstances” test to determine whether you have an undue hardship. While courts can also use other tests, these two tend to be the most common. In providing its guidance on student loan discharge through bankruptcy, the DOE listed the factors that often (and should) play into determinations of undue hardship. Some of these factors include the following:
·      Whether the debtor filed for bankruptcy because of factors beyond her control;
·      Whether the debtor pursued income-driven repayment plans;
·      Whether the debtor made student loan payments when she had available resources;
·      Whether the student loan debt is the debtor’s only debt;
·      Whether the student loan debt has been owed for a long time;
·      Whether the debtor has reaffirmed other debts dischargeable through bankruptcy;
·      Whether the debtor is nearing retirement;
·      Whether the debtor’s health has changed since she incurred her student loan debt;
·      Whether a long time has passed since the debtor incurred her student loan debt; and
·      Whether the debtor currently has reasonable expenses.
We will need to wait and see how the new DOE guidance plays out in the courtroom. In the meantime, if you have questions about how filing for personal bankruptcy may be able to help with your debts, you should speak with an experienced Oak Park bankruptcy lawyer. Contact the Emerson Law Firm today to learn more about how we can assist you.
See Related Blog Posts:
Bankruptcy Rates and the Affordable Care Act

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more