Deceptive Credit Card Collection Practices Come to an End

Thousands of Chicagoans become victims of unfair and deceptive credit card collection practices every year. In many cases, Illinois residents who filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and received a discharge of their unsecured debts, including the debts they accrued on credit cards, will receive collection calls about those very same credit card debts. According to a recent article in The New York Times, “the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the attorneys general of 47 U.S. States and Washington, D.C. brought an enforcement action against JPMorgan Chase for abuse, deception, and unfairness in credit card collection cases.”
Bank’s Failure to Comply with the Law
If you had your credit card debts discharged in bankruptcy, you shouldn’t be receiving collection calls about the money you allegedly owe. However, hundreds of thousands of credit card accounts were not handled properly by the bank. According a news release from the CFPB, the agency identified the following issues at Chase:
  • Chase sold bad debts. The bank “sold certain accounts that had already been settled by agreement, paid in full, discharged in bankruptcy, identified as fraudulent and not owed by the debtor, subject to an agreed-upon payment plan, no longer owned by chase, or that were otherwise no longer enforceable.”
  • The bank helped third-party debt buyers to collect those bad debts by providing “inadequate or incorrect information.”
  • By robo-signing more than 500,000 debt-collection lawsuits against consumers, Chase “systematically failed to prepare, review, and execute truthful statements as required by law.” Numerous debt-collection lawsuits also included calculation errors made by the bank, which “resulted in judgments against consumers for the correct amount.”
  • When Chase learned of errors involving debt collection, it failed to notify the consumers affected by the bank’s mistakes.
According to an e-mailed statement from Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan explaining what she supported the enforcement action, “this is another massive failure by Chase to comply with the law.” As Madigan emphasized, “Chase’s shoddy practices disrupted the financial stability of nearly 50,000 people in Illinois struggling with their credit-card debt in the wake of the economic crisis.”
Remedy for Debt Collection Problems
What does the enforcement action require JPMorgan Chase to do in order to remedy its bad actions and omissions? The enforcement actions requires the bank to:
  • Stop collections on 528,000 accounts.
  • Pay cash refunds to consumers who had pending litigation between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2014. Those amounts must be any sum above what the consumer actually owed at the time the debt was referred to litigation plus an additional “25 percent of the excess amount paid.”
  • Prohibit debt buyers from reselling accounts purchased from Chase (unless it’s back to Chase).
  • Confirm the validity of consumer debts before selling them or filing a lawsuit.
  • Notify consumers about their debts being sold while also providing them with additional information about their accounts.
  • Stop selling “zombie debts,” including those discharged through bankruptcy.
  • Withdraw or dismiss or terminate certain litigation pending after January 1, 2009.
  • Cease robo-signing practices.
  • Pay a civil penalty of $30 million.
Banks and other creditors must abide by the terms of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). If you believe you have been treated unfairly by a debt collector, particularly if you are being harassed about debts discharged through a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, you should discuss your case with an experienced Oak Park consumer protection attorney.
See Related Blog Posts:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more