Can Bankruptcy Prevent Creditor or Debt Collector Harassment?

For many Americans who are struggling with debt, one of the most difficult aspects of owing money is the constant contact from creditors and debt collectors. Even though consumers do have clear rights outlined in the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which include limitations on the times at which a debt collector can call and the ability for a debt collector to contact debtors at their places of employment, many people who owe substantial consumer debt still face seemingly relentless phone calls, emails, and other forms of communication from creditors or debt collection companies. If you are in this situation, you might be wondering: can consumer bankruptcy prevent creditor or debt collector harassment? Or, in other words, can filing for bankruptcy stop these creditors or debt collectors from engaging in this kind of constant contact?

In short, the answer is yes due to the automatic stay in Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases. We want to provide you with more information about how the automatic stay works, as well as to tell you about other options for dealing with debt collector harassment.

Automatic Stay Prevents Contact and Action From Creditors and Debt Collectors

Whether you are considering Chapter 7 bankruptcy or Chapter 13 bankruptcy, you should know that the automatic stay will apply to your bankruptcy case as soon as you file. The automatic stay is among the most powerful tools of bankruptcy because it stops any action by creditors or debt collectors, from phone calls to legal steps. According to the Cornell Legal Information Institute, you should know that the automatic stay is “an automatic injunction that prohibits most creditor collection activities after the debtor has filed for bankruptcy.” Indeed, “the stay begins at the moment the bankruptcy petition is filed,” and a creditor can only take action against the debtor by petitioning the court and proving that its “interest in collateral is not adequately protected.”

In sum, as soon as you file for bankruptcy, the automatic stay stops creditors and debt collectors from doing any of the following:
  • Making contact with you to try to get you to pay the debt you owe;
  • Filing a lawsuit against you;
  • Moving to garnish your wages or your bank account; or
  • Repossessing property.
Creditors and debt collectors can face serious consequences if they continue taking actions to collect debt, including even phone calls, once the automatic stay is in place.

Protections Against Harassment by Creditors and Debt Collectors

Even if you do not file for consumer bankruptcy, you should know that the FDCPA provides protections against harassment by creditors and debt collectors. If you do face harassment, you may be eligible to file a claim. However, it will be essential to seek advice from a consumer protection attorney about the type of contact you are facing from a debt collector and whether it rises to the level of harassment under the FDCPA.

Seek Advice from an Oak Park Bankruptcy Lawyer

Do you have questions about the automatic stay or the benefits of filing for consumer bankruptcy? One of our experienced Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can assist you. Contact the Emerson Law Firm to learn more about how we can help.



See Related Blog Posts:

What Should I Expect After I File for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy?

Bankruptcy and Disability Benefits: What You Should Know

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more