News About Debt Collection Rulemaking

As many consumers in the Chicago area know, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is a federal agency that has a primary task of regulating the industry of debt collection in our country. According to a recent article from ACA International, the CFPB announced its Spring 2016 Regulatory Agenda, which includes a timetable for debt collection rulemaking. Currently, the CFPB remains in “pre-rule activities,” which must come before “the next step of the highly anticipated rulemaking,” according to the article. Why is CFPB rulemaking important, and why are consumer advocates eager to see this process move forward? To better understand, we should take a closer look at the article and the implications of the CFPB’s regulatory agenda.
Implications of the Spring Regulatory Agenda
While terms like “pre-rule activities,” “rulemaking,” and “comment period” can be confusing for the average Oak Park resident, one of the most important pieces of information about CFPB rulemaking is simple: the agency is taking steps to protect consumers from abusive and unfair debt collection practices. As the article explains, the CFPB’s Spring 2016 Regulatory Agenda “is an indication of its intentions to move forward with the debt collection . . . process in the near term.”
The updated agenda indicates that the CFPB expects its pre-rule activities to last until at least June of this year. In other words, the rulemaking process will not move forward until then, and the pre-rule activities may in fact last beyond that date. While the agenda does make clear that the CFPB is moving along in the rulemaking process, its recently released agenda does not “really provide any significant insight into the date when a proposed rule for debt collection will finally be released,” according to the article. The article also underscores that the rulemaking has been delayed previously.
Impact of CFPB Debt Collection Rulemaking
What will the eventual impact look like when it comes to CFPB rulemaking? According to the CFPB’s website, a significant part of the agency’s Congressional mandate is to create rules that help to keep consumer finance markets effective. One of the more significant concerns in the CFPB’s recent rulemaking efforts concerns mandatory arbitration clauses.
As a CFPB article makes clear, the agency is concerned that mandatory arbitration clauses, in many cases, hurt consumers. As such, the agency has proposed rules to prohibit mandatory arbitration clauses. The proposed rules are “designed to protect consumers’ right to pursue justice and relief and deter companies from violating the law.” In recent years, more credit card contracts and bank agreements have had mandatory arbitration clauses in them. In many cases, consumers do not even know that they have agreed to arbitration in the event that they are wronged by a creditor. Indeed, “hundreds of millions of consumer contracts” contain mandatory arbitration clauses, and they can prevent consumers from getting a fair hearing in court.
When do pre-rule activities and proposals finally result in rules going into effect? When a rule is proposed, there is a required comment period in which members of the public can provide comments. Only after the comment period will an agency like the CFPB issue a regulation.
If you have questions or concerns about your rights as a consumer, and experienced Oak Park consumer protection lawyer can help. Contact the Emerson Law Firm today for more information.
See Related Blog Posts:
Debt Collectors and Medical Bill Lawsuits

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti
Read more

Learning About Different Types of Wills

Whether you are young or old, single or married, wealthy or with limited financial means, healthy or dealing with a medical condition, it is important to make a will. Many people have incorrectly heard that wills are only necessary for particular people, such as those with a substantial amount of assets or for older adults in poor health. Yet wills are critical for adults of all ages, and an experienced Oak Park estate planning lawyer can help you to make one. Before you begin working with a lawyer on a will, you might start conducting your own research into wills in Illinois and the requirements for a valid will. In so doing, you are likely to come across information about many different types of wills, and you are probably going to wonder whether you will need more than one kind of will. In short, there are different terms that can be used to describe the form or function of a will, as well as some distinct types of wills. Our Oak Park estate planning attorneys can explain in more
Read more

Younger Parents Need an Estate Plan

It is critical for younger parents to have an estate plan, even if they know they are healthy and do not anticipate that anything will happen in the near future. Much too often, younger parents assume that they can wait until they are older to consider estate planning or until there is a health-related reason to begin the estate planning process. Yet estate planning is critically important for parents who have minor children. While estate planning is important for adults of all ages, it can allow parents to make important decisions about who will care for their children in the event that they become unable to do so themselves. Our Oak Park estate planning lawyers can explain in more detail. Naming a Guardian for Your Minor Children in Your Will Most importantly for younger parents, making a will allows you to name a guardian who can care for your child in the event of your unexpected death. Nobody anticipates a deadly accident or a sudden situation in which there is a need for another
Read more