Debt Collectors Cannot Charge “Pay-to-Pay” Fees

Debt collectors often attempt to charge extra fees when collecting debts from consumers, particularly when the consumer seeks to make a payment online or to make payments in other specific ways that the company says will incur a fee. According to a recent news release from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the CFPB has “issued an advisory opinion affirming that federal law often prohibits debt collectors from charging ‘pay-to-pay’ fees,” which are often known as “convenience fees.” As the CFPB clarified, these pay-to-pay fees, or convenience fees, “are imposed on consumers who want to make a payment in a particular way, such as online or by phone.” The advisory opinion is part of a longer focus by the CFPB to address “junk fees” that affect consumers.

What do you need to know about the CFPB’s advisory opinion and any effects it could have?

Details of the Advisory Opinion

According to the news release, the CFPB’s recent advisory opinion is based on language in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Under Section 808, which defines unfair practices by debt collectors, it is a violation of federal law for a debt collector to collect an amount of money from a debtor, which includes “any interest, fee, charge, or expense incidental to the principal obligation . . . unless such amount is expressly authorized by the agreement creating the debt or permitted by law.”

The advisory opinion looks to this section of the FDCPA and clarifies a number of key points for debt collectors, including the following:
  • Debt collectors cannot collect a fee unless that fee is allowed by the terms of the contract with the debtor;
  • Even when a law does not expressly allow a debt collector to collect a fee, the debt collector is not permitted to collect a fee unless it is in the contract since silence on the affirmative ability to collect a fee does not mean that it is lawful to collect the fee; and
  • Using a payment processor that charges a fee is also unlawful if the debt collector receives any kind of kickback from the payment processor.
Unlawful Fees are Bad for Consumers and Debt Collectors Alike

The CFPB emphasizes that pay-to-pay fees are harmful to both consumers and debt collectors alike. While the harms to consumers are obvious, these types of fees charged unlawfully by certain debt collectors does a disservice to debt collectors that are abiding by the law and complying with the FDCPA.

As the news release explains, “the CFPB wants to ensure that law-abiding debt collectors are not disadvantaged by their competitors that impose unlawful fees.”

Seek Advice From a Consumer Protection Attorney in Oak Park

If you are struggling with debt, you should seek advice from an Oak Park consumer protection lawyer about your rights under the FDCPA, and about options for getting back on track with your finances, such as a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy filing. We can speak with you today about your circumstances and provide you with advice that can help. Contact the Emerson Law Firm today for more information.


See Related Blog Posts:

What is the Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment and Technical Corrections Act?

What You Should Know About Credit Card Debt and Bankruptcy

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more