How and Why to Replace Your Bankruptcy Lawyer

The decision to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy or Chapter 13 bankruptcy can be a difficult one, especially when you have been attempting to find other solutions to manage your debt. For many debtors in Oak Park, filing for bankruptcy can be a relief. Whether you receive a discharge of your debts and a fresh start with a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing or the ability to restructure debts and avoid foreclosure by filing for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, bankruptcy protection can provide numerous benefits. Yet when your bankruptcy attorney makes a mistake in your case, it could be time to find new counsel.

We want to provide more details about the process of replacing your bankruptcy lawyer, as well as information about why you may want to consider changing attorneys once your bankruptcy case is underway.

How to Change Your Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Attorney
In order to change your bankruptcy attorney in a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 case, you will most likely need to seek the court’s permission. Under Local Rule 2091-1 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois—where most Oak Park resident cases are filed—this process begins by filing a motion. According to the rule, “an attorney of record may not withdraw, nor may any other attorneys appear on behalf of the same party or as a substitute for the attorney of record, without first obtaining leave of court by a motion.”

There is an exception that you should know about. In cases in which one attorney from the same firm replaces your current attorney, there is no need to file a motion. However, when your lawyer makes a serious error in your case, you will most likely seek advice from an attorney at a separate law firm.

Why You Might Want to Replace Your Bankruptcy Lawyer
Now that you know how to replace a lawyer in a bankruptcy case in the Chicago area, why would you want to do so? To be clear, simply getting frustrated with some of your lawyer’s behaviors may not be a sufficient reason to change attorneys. To be sure, if you change attorneys, you will likely end up paying much more in attorney’s fees. Moreover, your bankruptcy case may take longer to complete.

However, there are numerous scenarios in which you may want to replace your attorney. The following are some reasons to consider finding a new bankruptcy lawyer:
  • Your attorney does not respond to communication from you, from phone calls to emails;
  • Your attorney lacks experience handling bankruptcy cases;
  • Your attorney provided misinformation or incorrect information about the bankruptcy process, or bankruptcy law in general;
  • Your attorney missed an important filing deadline;
  • Your attorney incorrectly filled out or filed important documentation in your bankruptcy case; and/or
  • Your attorney failed to show up to a required meeting, from an individual appointment with you to the meeting of creditors.
Contact an Experienced Oak Park Bankruptcy Attorney
Replacing your bankruptcy lawyer can be complicated, but it may be necessary. If you need advice about your bankruptcy case or finding a new lawyer, you should speak with an experienced Oak Park bankruptcy lawyer at our firm. The Emerson Law Firm has years of experience assisting debtors in bankruptcy cases and other consumer protection matters. Contact us today for more information.


See Related Blog Posts:

Update on Department of Education and Debt Collection

Consumer Bankruptcies Increase Nationwide

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more