Mistakes to Avoid When Taking the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Means Test: Part I


If you are thinking about filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in Oak Park, Illinois, it is important to learn more about how a consumer qualifies for this type of bankruptcy. In short, anyone who wants to file for personal bankruptcy under Chapter 7 will need to pass what is known as the “means test.” The U.S. Courts explain that the means test is used to “determine whether the chapter 7 filing is presumptively abusive.” To put that another way, the means test is designed to determine whether a debtor has too much income, or too much earning ability, to be eligible for Chapter 7 bankruptcy without it being unfair. Since Chapter 7 is a liquidation bankruptcy, a debtor’s non-exempt property will be liquidated, and the debtor can get a fresh start with a bankruptcy discharge.
Yet for many consumers, taking the means test is complicated, and it is easy to make mistakes without the help of a bankruptcy lawyer. The following are some common mistakes that you should avoid when you are taking the means test for purposes of determining your eligibility for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
Failing to Provide Accurate Income Documentation
In order to pass the means test, a consumer must be able to show that his or her aggregate current monthly income over five years is at or below $12,850. In some cases, instead of using a specific monthly income amount, the debtor can pass the means test by showing that the aggregate currently monthly income over five years is at or below 25% of the debtor’s nonpriority unsecured debt, as long as that amount is less than $7,700. In order to pass the means test, the debtor must provide income documentation. Failure to provide the documentation, or providing documentation that gives figures different than those used in the means test, will result in the debtor being ineligible for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
Deducting Expenses That Cannot be Deducted
In taking the means test, a debtor is allowed to deduct certain expenses in order to show that she or he has a monthly income that qualifies for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. However, it is important to avoid making the mistake of deducting certain assets that cannot be deducted. For example, 401(k) accounts and other contributions to retirement accounts are not deductible. In addition, college expenses for your child are not deductible.
Failing to Take Deductions That are Allowed
Just as making incorrect deductions can result in you failing the means test and appearing to be ineligible for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, failing to take deductions that are allowable can also result in you unnecessarily failing the means test. For example, child support payments or alimony payments you make are deductible and will not count toward your aggregate monthly income.
Contact a Consumer Bankruptcy Lawyer in Oak Park
If you need help determining whether you are eligible to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, or if you need assistance with a consumer bankruptcy more generally, a dedicated Oak Park bankruptcy attorney at our firm can help. Contact the Emerson Law Firm to learn more about our services.
See Related Blog Posts:


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more