Learning About Fraudulent Conveyances in Personal Bankruptcy

When a debtor in Oak Park files for personal bankruptcy, she or he will need to provide clear documentation of financials, including assets, income, and other information. In addition, the debtor will be required to provide information about any recent property transfers made, including gifts and sales of property. The debtor must disclose any transfers that have been made in the last two years prior to filing for bankruptcy. All of this information is contained in a specific bankruptcy form known as Your Statement of Financial Affairs for Individuals Filing for Bankruptcy.

If a bankruptcy trustee suspects that a fraudulent transfer has been made, the trustee can attempt to recover that fraudulent transfer. The topic of fraudulent transfers—also known as fraudulent conveyances—can be confusing. We want to provide you with more information about the types of fraudulent transfers and the ways in which they can occur.

Two Different Types of Fraudulent Transfers
Under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, a trustee may “avoid” a transfer made by either:
Actual fraud; or Constructive fraud.

Actual Fraud Versus Constructive Fraud Under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
The U.S. Bankruptcy Code defines actual fraud as a transfer made “with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any entity to which the debtor was or became, on or after the date that such transfer was made or such obligation was incurred, indebted.” In other words, actual fraud occurs when a debtor transfers property with the intent to defraud or to prevent a creditor from obtaining the money that is owed. For example, actual fraud might involve a debtor owning a boat worth $20,000 and giving the boat as a gift to a sibling or friend in order to avoid having the boat sold in the Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding. In that situation, the debtor would be gifting the boat with the understanding and intent that the boat not become part of the liquidation of the estate.
Constructive fraud is a little bit different and can be more complex. In general, there is no need for the debtor to have any intent to defraud. Instead, for constructive fraud to exist, the debtor must have made a transfer of property for which she or he “received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange,” and the debtor must have been financially unable to pay his or her debts when she or he made the transfer or because of the transfer.
Given the language of “reasonably equivalent value,” determining whether there is constructive fraud can be more subjective than determining actual fraud. To be sure, something that is of “reasonably equivalent value” to one person might not be of “reasonably equivalent value” to another, especially when the transfer is made for services. Typically, cases in which a bankruptcy trustee suspects constructive fraud are those in which the debtor is insolvent but makes a transfer of property.
Learn More from an Oak Park Bankruptcy Lawyer
Do you have questions about fraudulent transfers under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, or more general questions about properly disclosing financial information? An experienced consumer bankruptcy lawyer in Oak Park can help. Contact the Emerson Law Firm for more information.

See Related Blog Posts:

Advocates Seek Consumer Protection from Abusive Debt Collection Tactics


New Study Addresses Credit Card Debt and Rising Interest Rates

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more