U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Debtor in Bankruptcy Case


The Background on the Case
Earlier this year we discussed the consumer bankruptcy case of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling. In the case, the debtor told the creditor that he planned to repay the debt with a tax refund of $100,000. The debtor actually applied for a tax refund of only $60,000, and did not repay the debt. When all was said and done, he owed the creditor $104,000. The debtor filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, and sought to have the $104,000 debt discharged. The creditor argued that the debt was not dischargeable because it fell into the category of a “fraud exception” under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
Under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, a debtor cannot discharge a debt that has been “obtained by false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud.” However, there is an exception to this fraud exception. The Bankruptcy Code clarifies that, when a debtor makes a statement that looks like fraud, the debt can still be discharged if the statement was “respecting the debtor’s . . . financial condition.”
When the U.S. Supreme Court heard the case, the issue largely concerned an interpretation of the phrase “respecting the debtor’s . . . financial condition” and, more specifically, the definition of the word “respecting.”
Defining the Word “Respecting” in the Bankruptcy Code
According to a report on the case in SCOTUSblog, Appling “turned on the breadth of the word ‘respecting’ since it is not defined in the Bankruptcy Code. The Court had to determine whether the debtor’s single statement about his debt—the statement in which he said he would repay the debt with a tax refund—could qualify has a statement “respecting the debtor’s . . . financial condition.” The debtor argued that the single statement could in fact qualify as a statement “respecting the debtor’s . . . financial condition,” allowing the debt to be dischargeable as an exception to the exception, while the creditor argued that the single statement could not qualify as such.
In brief, the Court clarified that “a statement about a single asset can be a ‘statement respecting the debtor’s financial condition.’” In other words, the debtor was eligible to have the $104,000 debt discharged because it was an exception to the exception.
The Court focused heavily on defining the word “respecting” in order to determine whether a single statement could fall into the exception-to-the-exception category, allowing the debtor’s debt to be discharged. The Court explained that, “in ordinary usage, ‘respecting’ means ‘concerning; about; regarding; in regard to; relating to.’” The creditor wanted the word “respecting” to be defined narrowly so that it could not refer to a single statement made by the debtor, while the debtor wanted the term to be defined broadly so that it could include a single statement. The Court went on to clarify that “use of the word ‘respecting’ in a legal context generally has a broadening effect, ensuring that a provision’s scope covers not only its subject but also matters relating to that subject.”
The key takeaway is this: A single statement made by a debtor can indeed be a “statement about a single asset can be a ‘statement respecting the debtor’s financial condition,” thereby allowing the debtor to discharge the debt as an exception to the fraud exception.
Discuss Your Case with an Oak Park Bankruptcy Lawyer
Bankruptcy discharge issues can be complicated. If you are considering bankruptcy or have questions about whether a particular type of debt is dischargeable, an Oak Park bankruptcy attorney can help. Contact the Emerson Law Firm today to get started on your case.
See Related Blog Posts:

Comments

  1. Richard C. LambertJanuary 29, 2019 at 9:47 PM

    Hi, I find reading this article a joy. It is extremely helpful and interesting and very much looking forward to reading more of your work.. lemon law attorneys los angeles

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mark DinFebruary 26, 2019 at 12:45 AM

    I recommend any content. It's always wonderful to work out you will explain in words from middle and additionally picture quality using this valuable content is quite simply recognized. probate collin county texas

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more