Chicago Attorney General and FTC Settle with Debt Collectorsdebt

Do you live in the Chicago area, and were you contacted in the last several years by a debt collection company attempting to collect a debt that you did not think you owed? In some cases, debt collection companies may not know that a debtor has settled a debt and thus continue to make collection attempts. In other cases, however, fake debt collectors violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and attempt to scam consumers. According to a recent press release from Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s office, the Illinois Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have reached “three separate settlements totaling $47 million with the operators of a Chicago-area fake debt collection scheme.”
If you have been harassed by a debt collector, it is important to learn more about the settlements and how they could impact consumers in Oak Park.
Payday Loans and Phantom Debt
The settlements arose from Operation Collection Protection, a crackdown operation that brings together federal and state officials to handle abusive debt collection practices.
Generally speaking, the settlements address tactics used against consumers who “obtained or applied for payday or other short-term loans.” The companies that have agreed to the settlement include Stark Law, Stark Recovery, and Capital Harris Miller. According to the news release, over the last two years, these debt collectors “pretended to be a law firm with authority to sue and obtain substantial judgments against delinquent consumers.” In addition, the companies “sold bogus payday loan debt portfolios to other debt buyers, who then tried to collect the fake debts.
According to Madigan, “The Stark Law Firm and its affiliates coerced consumers through lies and threats into paying fake or ‘phantom’ debt—debts consumers had already paid back or never owed in the first place.”
Repercussions and Remedies for Deceptive and Abusive Debt Collection Practices
What are some of the consequences of the settlement? In the terms of the settlement, the debt collectors have been banned from the debt collection business entirely, and specifically from selling debt portfolios. Stark Law, Stark Recovery, and Capital Harris Miller have also been banned from “misrepresenting financial products and services, profiting from customers’ personal information and failing to dispose of such information properly.” Those are some of the repercussions for the debt collection companies engaged in abusive and deceptive debt collection practices. What about the consumers who were harmed by these actions?
As part of the settlement, the companies listed above will also be required to surrender their assets, which total at least $9 million. Certain owners will be required to surrender property and other assets. Those assets will then be distributed to consumers who were harmed by the abusive collection practices.
Seek Advice from an Oak Park Consumer Protection Lawyer
Were you targeted by an abusive or deceptive debt collector? You may be eligible to seek compensation. Whether you were harmed by one of the operators named in the recent settlement or another debt collection company, it is important to seek advice from an advocate. An experienced Oak Park consumer protection lawyer can discuss your case with you today. Contact the Emerson Law Firm for more information.
See Related Blog Posts:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more