Consumer Advocates Oppose Debt Collection Bill

Do you have concerns about fair debt collection and protections that are in place in Oak Park to help consumers who have been subject to fraudulent debt collection practices? According to a recent article in The Detroit News, a piece of proposed legislation by U.S. Rep. Dave Trott would amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) in such a way that consumer advocates argue would harm debtors immensely. Indeed, “Drawing the ire of consumer groups,” the bill “would allow attorneys and law firms to sidestep federal law barring abusive debt-collection practices such as making false threats and pressuring people to pay debts they don’t actually owe.”
To be clear, the bill would exempt lawyers from liability in certain FDCPA violation cases. It is important for the FDCPA to be a law that Oak Park consumers know is there to protect them if they are harassed by a debt collector, or given misleading or fraudulent information. To better understand what this bill aims to do, we should take a closer look at it.
H.R. 1849 Would Exempt Parties from Liability in Debt Collection Lawsuits
The proposed legislation is H.R. 1849. The specific language in the bill describes its aims: “To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to exclude law firms and licensed attorneys who are engaged in activities related to legal proceedings from the definition of debt collector, to amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to prevent the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection from exercising supervisory or enforcement authority with respect to attorneys when undertaking certain actions related to legal proceedings, and for other purposes.”
To be clear, the bill seems to have two goals - to exempt lawyers from liability under the FDCPA and to prevent the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) from exercising supervision over or enforcement of lawyers engaged in debt collection cases. While the bill was proposed by a U.S. House member from Michigan, if it were to pass, its impact would be nationwide.
Should the CFPB be Able to Regulate Lawyers’ Actions in Debt Collection Matters?
Some commentators allege that Trott has proposed the legislation due to his personal experiences as a lawyer, including being “sued in federal court for alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.” Given Trott’s professional experience as a lawyer in such matters, some contend that there is a conflict of interest.
Should the CFPB be able to supervise lawyers engaged in debt collection cases, or to enforce the FDCPA against lawyers more generally? According to one advocate, the amendments proposed by H.R. 1849 would prevent certain lawyers from being held accountable for “debt-collection ‘mills’—large legal practices that generate and file tens of thousands of debt collection cases a year.” Many consumers seek protections from practices of law firms engaging in debt collection just as they seek protections under the FDCPA from more specific debt collection companies.
Seek Advice from an Oak Park Consumer Protection Lawyer
If you have questions about your rights as a consumer or concerns about filing a claim under the FDCPA, an experienced Oak Park consumer protection lawyer can assist you. Contact the Emerson Law Firm today to speak with an experienced consumer advocate.
See Related Blog Posts:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more