New Bankruptcy Rules Taking Effect on December 1, 2017

There are a series of new bankruptcy rules that will take effect on December 1, 2017, and they will have an impact on consumer bankruptcy proceedings. Generally speaking, most of these new rules will have the greatest impact on financial institutions, but it is important for individual debtors who are thinking about filing for bankruptcy to understand how the new rules will work and how they will change aspects of personal bankruptcy.
First, we will say a few words about how these changes came about. Then we will discuss some of the changes and will explain what consumers in Oak Park should know about bankruptcy proceedings once the rules take effect on December 1. In the meantime, if you have questions about filing for consumer bankruptcy in the Chicago area, you should speak with an experienced bankruptcy lawyer.
Supreme Court Submits Amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
Official changes to bankruptcy rules began when Chief Justice John Roberts, acting for the U.S. Supreme Court, submitted amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure to Congress back in April 2017. The Supreme Court adopted a number of different amendments, including amendments related to Chapter 13 filings, as well as proof of claim requirements and timelines. There is also a new Rule 3015.1
What are some of the amendments? The following provides debtors with information about specific amendments and changes to federal bankruptcy rules:
  • Paying the bankruptcy filing fee in installments: Under Amended Rule 1006, debtors have been able to file for bankruptcy protection with an application to pay the filing fee in installments if that debtor is unable to pay in any other way. The rule has been amended to make clear that “a voluntary petition by an individual shall be accepted for filing, regardless of whether any portion of the filing fee is paid, if accompanied by the debtor’s signed application . . .” This amendment should help to ensure that debtors are able to file for consumer bankruptcy with plans to pay the filing fee on an installment basis, even if they cannot make payment up front.
  • Requirements for filing a proof of claim: Under Amended Rule 3002, secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and equity security holders are required to file a proof of claim in order for that claim to be allowed. In addition, in voluntary Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 cases, a proof of claim must be filed no later than 70 days after the individual files for bankruptcy. These amendments are good for debtors because they clarify the timetable for when creditors must file a proof of claim.
  • Requirements for a Model Chapter 13 plan: Under Amended Rule 3015 and Rule 3015.1, a district can require that a debtor use a Local Form for a Chapter 13 plan if a number of specific conditions (regarding the Local Form) are satisfied. This is complicated but important, and you should always work with an Oak Park bankruptcy attorney before completing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan.
Contact an Oak Park Bankruptcy Attorney
The amendments and rule changes we mentioned above are just a few of those that will take effect on December 1, 2017. If you have questions about how the rule changes could impact your bankruptcy case, you should speak with a bankruptcy attorney in Oak Park as soon as possible. Contact the Emerson Law Firm for more information.
See Related Blog Posts:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more