American Bankruptcy Institute Webinar Questions Reforms

Last week, we discussed bankruptcy reform from 2005 and the position that the changes to the system did not go far enough. While some experts believe that we need to do more to consumer bankruptcies, others argue that we are not doing enough to protect debtors in need. What should we make of the bankruptcy reforms that came through the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA)?
According to a recent article from Bloomberg BNA, some consumer advocates believe that the bankruptcy reform measures that went into effect a decade ago may have caused “more harm than good.” To be sure, a panel of experts at a webinar held by the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI) suggests that the overhaul to the consumer bankruptcy system “may be driving away consumers who are the most in need of the system’s protection.”
Cons of the Bankruptcy Overhaul
Some commentators emphasize that bankruptcy reform did, at least in part, what it set out to do: to lower the number of consumer bankruptcy filings. And to be sure, the total number of personal bankruptcies has declined in the U.S. over the last ten years. A recent report from Reuters, which cited a Fitch Ratings’ Report, emphasized that “ongoing stability in the labor market has U.S. personal bankruptcy filings set for a fifth straight annual decline.” The expected bankruptcy filings for 2015 will come in at about 11 percent lower than the total number reported in 2014.
But what about consumers who need bankruptcy protection and are having difficulty qualifying for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, for instance? Two panelists in particular at the ABI webinar contended that the BAPCPA “has created more obstacles for honest consumer debtors,” resulting in the inability for many Chicagoans to obtain bankruptcy protection when they need it most.
The BAPCPA was created in part to prevent wealthy debtors who did not actually need the protections of consumer bankruptcy—those who could actually afford to pay the debts they owed—from being eligible for these protections. The law aimed to prevent fraudulent bankruptcy filings. Yet according to Professor Lois R. Lupica from the University of Maine School of Law, “empirical studies have found no evidence of such widespread abuse among consumer debtors.” In other words, the law was supposed to prevent unnecessary bankruptcies, but data suggests that lower and middle-class consumer debtors were not the ones most likely to commit bankruptcy fraud.
Debtors in Need Cannot Afford Bankruptcy Protection
According to Lupica, the BAPCPA effectively makes the protections of personal bankruptcy financially unavailable to many who need them. The poorest debtors who would benefit the most from filing for bankruptcy simply cannot file. Studies confirm the rising costs of Chapter 7 bankruptcy and how this kind of protection has become cost-prohibitive under the BAPCPA. For instance, a recent study from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported that the median costs for debtors filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy have risen 38 percent. With fewer needy debtors able to file, we continue to witness “a rise in the number of insolvent individuals.”
Filing for consumer bankruptcy can be an extremely complicated process. If you have questions about whether you are eligible to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in Chicago or whether personal bankruptcy is right for you, it is important to seek advice from an experienced Oak Park bankruptcy attorney. A consumer advocate at the Emerson Law Firm can speak with you today. Contact us to learn more about how we can assist you.
See Related Blog Posts:
Rule to Improve Consumer Credit Access to Mortgage Market

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more