Filing for Bankruptcy a Second Time

If you have previously filed for consumer bankruptcy, can you file for bankruptcy again? According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, both individuals and businesses often become repeat filers of bankruptcy, and some commentators believe that someone must be to blame when a party files for bankruptcy more than once. Should bankruptcy courts be concerned about serial filers? Or should we think about multiple bankruptcy filings as actions that often are necessary for debtors to become financially healthy and reliable consumers?
Serial Filing in Bankruptcy Court
What is a serial filer, exactly? When you hear about serial filing, it refers to individuals or businesses who are repeat—or in some cases chronic—bankruptcy filers. In other words, serial filers are parties who seek bankruptcy protection more than once. However, filing for bankruptcy on more than one occasion doesn’t necessarily mean you are a serial filer. Although some repeat filers will file again in fewer than two years, many repeat bankruptcy filers have a gap of eight years or more between bankruptcy filings. While the average is three years between filings, many debtors wait almost a decade before they seek bankruptcy protection again.
Should we be skeptical of individuals who file for bankruptcy a second time with less than 24 months between filings? Some bankruptcy courts do have concerns about repeat filings, but by and large, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code limits the rate of bankruptcy discharges for consumers who need to file more than once (or more than a couple times).
Bankruptcy law doesn’t specify a minimum amount of time that a debtor must wait before filing for bankruptcy a second time, but it does prevent multiple bankruptcy discharges from taking place in too short a time. Generally, whether you can receive another discharge of your debts depends upon when you file, as well as the chapter under which you seek bankruptcy protection.
Chapter 7 Versus Chapter 13 Filings
Let’s say you have already filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and you want to file a second time. You will need to wait eight years before being eligible for another discharge under Chapter 7. How does the waiting time differ between a liquidation bankruptcy (e.g., Chapter 7) and a reorganization (e.g., Chapter 13)? Let’s say instead you have previously filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy and received a discharge. Now, unless the court refuses to confirm your repayment plan the second time around, you may only need to wait two years for a second discharge.
But the rules change a bit when you first file for Chapter 7 and later want to file for Chapter 13, or vice versa. In short, you will need to wait longer to first file Chapter 13 and later file again under Chapter 7. However, the details are quite complex, and it is important to seek help from an experienced bankruptcy attorney.
Contact a Chicago Bankruptcy Lawyer
Bankruptcy is complicated, even if you are filing for the first time. If you have questions about how filing for Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy might help you, you should be sure to discuss your situation with an experienced Chicago bankruptcy lawyer. If you have filed for bankruptcy in the past and have concerns about whether you will be able to discharge debts in a subsequent proceeding, contact the Emerson Law Firm to learn more about how we can help with your case.
See Related Blog Posts:
Consumer Credit Card Debt Rises

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more