Too Broke for Bankruptcy Protection

Can an Oak Park consumer actually be too poor to file for bankruptcy? According to a recent article from Nasdaq.com, there’s a new economic class of Americans that are “permanently insolvent.” Indeed, nearly 10 years after federal bankruptcy law reform known as the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA), many Americans simply aren’t in a better financial position. A great deal of consumers actually appear to be worse off, as “they’re too poor to file for bankruptcy protection” given that, as a result of the reforms, the cost to file actually “quadrupled.”
Creditor Harassment and Mounting Debt
For those who have become part of the “permanently insolvent” class, do we need to rethink the bankruptcy laws in our country? As the article points out, without the possibility of bankruptcy protection, “the insolvent are endlessly harassed by creditors and are more likely to lose their homes through foreclosure.”
To be sure, debt only continues to grow while options for alleviating it evaporate. When you’re “saddled with unrelieved debt,” you’re highly unlikely to be able to “get a new credit card, most other forms of credit, or a fresh start.” For low-income Chicago residents, these limitations can be devastating, particularly given that a majority of lower income Americans have very little savings to turn to in the event of an unforeseen event, such as emergency surgery or a necessary automobile repair.
Economists from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Columbia University recently published a study entitled “Insolvency After the 2005 Bankruptcy Reform,” which tracks the problematic relationship between the law and the poorest Americans. According to Stefania Albanesi, the lead author of the study, “the reform has generated a substitution, from formal bankruptcy to insolvency.”
The BAPCPA and Conclusions About Insolvency
If the BAPCPA is hurting the poorest Illinoisans, should we change the way we think about bankruptcy protection? The study came to a number of conclusions about the BAPCPA, which were summarized by Nasdaq.com. Some of those conclusions include the following:
  • The BAPCPA has, by and large, helped banks, other financial institutions, and credit cards companies. According to Albanesi, “profitability has risen for credit card companies as a result of the BAPCPA.”
  • Low-income Americans have been “the most deeply damaged” by the BAPCPA. The lowest economic class is, to be sure, the “most in need of help,” but the BAPCPA only hurts by preventing those consumers from filing for bankruptcy. Albanesi indicated that the reform did result in a decline in bankruptcy filings, but it’s simply because those filings “were replaced by a sizable rise in solvency and foreclosure.”
  • In case you weren’t sure, insolvency puts a much greater strain on consumers than filing for bankruptcy protection. Albanesi explains that “insolvency is a state associated with a high degree of financial distress in comparison to bankruptcy,” and “this consequence of BAPCPA is potentially welfare reducing for households.”
Insolvency and bankruptcy are two different situations. Although they might sound the same, given that insolvent consumers as well as those filing for bankruptcy cannot pay their debts, insolvency makes it extremely difficult to recover from financial setbacks. If you have questions about your ability to file for bankruptcy, contact an experienced Oak Park bankruptcy attorney today.
See Related Blog Posts:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more