Effects of the Bankruptcy Abuse Protection and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA)

If you’re thinking about filing for consumer bankruptcy, you might have heard about the Bankruptcy Abuse Protection and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA).  What is this law, and can it prevent debtors from filing for bankruptcy?
The BAPCPA’s Contentious History and the Limits of Debt Forgiveness
The BAPCPA, a law that amended the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, was the result of “intense lobbying” from credit card companies, according to an article in the Washington Post.  This legislation was passed back in 2005, and it was aimed at preventing consumers from taking advantage of bankruptcy protection.  To be sure, it was designed as a reform measure, intended to limit personal bankruptcies and their effects.  However, the law has been contentious since it was passed.
On the one hand, some commentators believe that debtors will take advantage of the ability to discharge debt in bankruptcy, and that legislation like the BAPCPA is necessary to protect consumers.  Consumer advocates, on the other hand, believe it’s important to assist well-meaning consumers who have acquired unexpected debts by allowing them the full protections associated with personal bankruptcy.
In other words, commentators on both sides reflect the balancing act that bankruptcy law must always attend to: “helping debtors who experience adverse shocks by discharging some of their debt, and promoting credit availability by enforcing the obligation to repay.”
What are the potential harms associated with debt forgiveness in bankruptcy?  For one, forgiving debts in Chapter 7 bankruptcy, for instance, “harms future borrowers by reducing credit availability and raising interest rates.”  In short, consumers who don’t need bankruptcy protection argue that an ease of filing for bankruptcy actually hurts people financially who don’t need to file for it.
Definitions and Results of the BAPCPA
So how, precisely, does the BAPCPA limit bankruptcy filings?  In short, the law does one primary thing: it prevents debtors from choosing between Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy.  Before this reform legislation was passed, debtors could choose between the two types of bankruptcy, and those debtors could expect that most of their unsecured debts would be discharged.  Now, however, under the BAPCPA, debtors must pass the “means test” in order to be eligible for Chapter 7.  If they don’t pass the means test (in other words, if the debtor’s income is above a certain defined amount), then the debtor will only be able to file for Chapter 13.
In addition to limiting the types of bankruptcy available to all debtors, the BAPCPA also instituted some other significant changes, including but not limited to:
·      Increasing the costs of filing for personal bankruptcy;
·      Reducing the amount of debt discharged;
·      Lengthening the minimum waiting period between bankruptcy filings; and
·      Requiring debtors to engage in credit counseling and debt education courses.
What have the effects of the BAPCPA been?  For one, it has reduced the number of consumer bankruptcy filings.  To be sure, a study published in the American Bankruptcy Law Journal found that the reforms associated with the BAPCPA brought down the total number of bankruptcies across the country and decreased credit card companies’ losses.  However, in limiting the ability for a debtor to file, the law may be hurting consumers in Chicago and across the country.
Before you file for personal bankruptcy, it’s important to remember that state and federal bankruptcy laws are extremely complicated.  An experienced Chicago bankruptcy attorney at the Emerson Law Firm can examine your situation and discuss your options with you today.
See Related Blog Posts:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more