Are Inherited IRA Funds Exempt During Bankruptcy?


Are individual retirement account (IRA) funds protected from creditors during a personal bankruptcy proceeding?  The U.S. Supreme recently heard arguments in Clark v. Rameker, a bankruptcy case concerning inherited IRA funds.  According to an article in Digital Journal, the Supreme Court’s decision in this case “could have an impact on future bankruptcy cases across the U.S.” and could have significant implications for other courts interpreting the Bankruptcy Code.  
If you have questions about protecting your assets in a bankruptcy, it’s very important to speak with an experienced Illinois bankruptcy lawyer.  At the Emerson Law Firm, we have been assisting Chicago residents with bankruptcies for years, and we can answer your questions today.
Details of Clark v. Rameker
In 2010, a husband and wife, Heidi Heffron-Clark and Brandon Clark, filed a voluntary joint Chapter 7 bankruptcy when their a pizza shop failed.  At the time of filing for bankruptcy, the Clarks claimed an inherited IRA under the retirement funds exemption of Section 522 of the Bankruptcy Code.  When the Clarks filed for bankruptcy, they owed their landlord approximately $700,000, and they also owed additional money to mortgage lenders and other creditors connected to their small business.
How did the Clarks have funds from an inherited IRA?  Heidi inherited approximately $300,000 from her mother’s IRA after her mother, Ruth Heffron, passed away.  When she died in 2011, the IRA was worth about $300,000.  Heidi established a Beneficiary IRA (or inherited IRA), and she transferred the balance from Ruth’s IRA account into the Beneficiary IRA. In other words, the Clarks hadn’t created the IRA with their own funds, but rather, they inherited an account that was created with Ruth Heffron’s funds.
Naturally, the Clarks’ creditors and the bankruptcy trustee, William Rameker, objected to the exemption when the Clarks filed for bankruptcy and argued that an IRA should only be exempt when it has been created with funds created by the party or parties filing for bankruptcy.  Now, the U.S. Supreme Court will have to decide whether the IRA exemption under Section 522 of the Bankruptcy Code applies to an inherited IRA.  In short, does an inherited IRA constitute a “retirement fund” under Section 522 such that it is exempt when a debtor files for bankruptcy?  As the Legal Information Institute points out, this case has significant implications for both “debtors’ and creditors’ access to inherited IRAs once a debtor files for bankruptcy.”
Inherited IRAS and Exemptions Under 11. U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(C)
The part of the Bankruptcy Code under scrutiny in this case, Section 522(b)(3)(C), exempts certain kinds of “retirement funds.”  Courts have been split about whether an inherited IRA counts as a “retirement fund” such that it is exempt under the Bankruptcy Code.  For example, a district court ruled in favor of the Clarks, but an appellate court held that IRA funds are no longer protected, or exempt, once they’re inherited.  In other words, retirement funds are only protected if they’re created with the debtor’s own funds.
Since § 522(b)(3)(C) doesn’t explicitly say that retirement funds must be the original property of the person or parties filing for bankruptcy, the U.S. Supreme Court will have to consider whether Congress actually meant for inherited IRAs to be exempt during bankruptcy proceedings.  At the same time, Congressional intent will be just one issue for the U.S. Supreme Court to consider before it issues a ruling.
No matter how the Court decides, this case shows how complicated Chapter 7 bankruptcies can be.  If you are filing for bankruptcy and have inherited funds, you’ll need an experienced Chicago bankruptcy attorney on your side.  Contact the Emerson Law Firm today to learn more.
See Related Blog Posts:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Phantom Debt Collection Scams on the Rise in Illinois

Have you been contacted by a person claiming to be a debt collector who is seeking to recover a debt you allegedly owe? If so, you are not alone. According to a recent report from CBS Chicago , such parties claiming to be debt collectors are on the rise, and they are scamming Chicago-area residents. These alleged debt collectors are part of schemes known as “phantom debt collection scams,” since they involve the attempt to collect on a debt that the consumer does not actually owe. How can you avoid becoming a victim in a debt-collection scam ? What should you do if you have been targeted by a fake debt collector? How Do Phantom Debt Collection Scams Work? Now, you might be thinking to yourself: I would never agree to make payment on a debt that I did not owe. But the scam is not always that simple. Parties at the center of debt-collection scams often target consumers who do actually owe debts (to someone or to some entity), and they prey on the fact that these c...
Read more

Payday Lending and Predatory Lenders in Illinois

If you are in substantial debt in the Chicago area and are living in a paycheck-to-paycheck cycle, you may have taken out a payday loan to make ends meet. While payday lending is illegal in a number of states due to the predatory nature of these loans, it remains legal in Illinois. As a result, many debtors in the state have used payday lenders, and far too many of those borrowers cannot repay what they owe. According to a recent article from Progress Illinois , consumers have filed complaints about payday lenders in the state, illuminating a need for federal rules that address harmful lending practices . Predatory Payday Lenders and Protections for Consumers Due to the perceived predatory nature of payday loans, twelve states in the country have banned these lenders from operating completely, according to a fact sheet from loans.org . The states that currently have laws prohibiting payday lenders from operating include Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Mary...
Read more

New Information on Debts That Bankruptcy Cannot Discharge

If you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy in the Oak Park area, it is important to know that certain kinds of debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy case. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, these are known as non-dischargeable debts, or exceptions to discharge. There are certain types of debts that have long been identified clearly as non-dischargeable debts, while there are misconceptions about other types of debts that may or may not be dischargeable. As an article in CNBC discusses, the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in the case of Bartenwerfer v. Buckley , which clarifies that debts incurred due to another party’s fraud cannot be discharged in an individual’s bankruptcy case. Our Oak Park bankruptcy attorneys can explain the Court’s recent ruling and provide you with additional information on dischargeable and non-dischargeable debts. Supreme Court Says Debt Incurred Due to Another’s Fraud is Non-Dischargeable The recent Bartenwerfer case involved a debtor attempti...
Read more